- Joined
- Dec 30, 2020
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 1
- Age
- 60
They have been able to apply for BVLOS waivers if they want. Same with altitude, but I do not expect they would need to fly more than 400" AGL.I do not think the new regs deal with either yet ... they need to implement Remote ID first and get that squared away.My question was mainly about the commercial end, with companies like Amazon, and FedEx, and others who want to start drone deliveries. How can that be accomplished, and still comply with LOS and altitude restrictions?
There is no change to either of those two rules with the new rules.With the new rules, does it change LOS restrictions, and altitude restrictions?
Hi Perry,Now how far out can you fly your drone at night and keep line of sight? Until we get transponders drones, they aren't going to give us too much freedom, and that is understandable.
They won’t need to ‘comply’, because they have DEEP pocket$. Complying is for the wee poeple, you know the ones that actually pay the bills. It’s going to get very interesting when folks starts receiving letters from the FA LA LA LA administration for altitude violations with the links attached, revealing flight telemetry and the associated fine(s) for the said violation(s). Oh and copies forwarded to the local PD. These will not be like the ones for a parking meter violations either.My question was mainly about the commercial end, with companies like Amazon, and FedEx, and others who want to start drone deliveries. How can that be accomplished, and still comply with LOS and altitude restrictions?
They most certainly will have to comply. Not with 107, but with Part 135. And deep pockets have zero to do with this. As a matter of fact, they wanted the internet transmission RID requirement. And they lost big time.They won’t need to ‘comply’, because they have DEEP pocket$.
I'm not sure how you think we pay the bills. At $5 per registration, and only $160 for the initial test (& free thereafter). And the recreational test will be free as well. So we're obviously not paying any bills.Complying is for the wee poeple, you know the ones that actually pay the bills.
RID will not be stored, so there is no way for the FAA to send anyone a violation. But at worst, an LEO will show up and possible give you a ticket.It’s going to get very interesting when folks starts receiving letters from the FA LA LA LA administration for altitude violations with the links attached, revealing flight telemetry and the associated fine(s) for the said violation(s).
I honestly have no idea where you came up with this statement. It wreaks of paranoia and/or LEO disrespect.Oh and copies forwarded to the local PD. These will not be like the ones for a parking meter violations either.
It will be tracked in real time. So people who ignore rules can be found and educated. Or depending on attitude, prosecuted.If RID will not be stored, then why is it imperative that it be tracked, Vic? So we have ‘your’ personal assurance on this, correct? Thank you for your opinion, it can now be deposited in the circular file.
Delivery companies either have waivers or fly under Part 135. So they will not fall under the same restrictions. And odds are they'll be required to have network based RID as well.My original comment was only concerning, if the same restrictions would apply to delivery companies, which right now is a guess. Personally, I wear a seatbelt, fly below 400', do the speed limit, or close to it, and fly VLOS, and will follow the FAA guidelines to the best of my ability. I love flying, for the hobby, and for my business, and I don't want to screw that up.
Thank you for your opinion, it can now be deposited in the circular file.
Some people don't want to hear the truth. But thanks for the comment.You really should make an effort to find out who Vic is. I think you’ll reconsider this statement.