Several cities have created their own... and when challenged tend to have no weight. Not that I'm suggesting an attitude to challenge and encourage legal or political arguments. I'd tend to "work with, not against" til no wiggle room in corner.
This City Reg started out basically duplicating FAA PT107 guidelines, almost same verbiage. Till the limitations, exceptions & fee sections.
The 500 ft Horz distance from a list of structures... some duplicating FAA & reconized, some enacted by city management that I would think likely not enforceable if challenged in Court. As mentioned above
@KLAX , LZ yes, airspace questionable.
I'm not sure where the LEO got the PT107 only, only specific section for PT107 - Commercial, was pertaining to the "Business License" and need to purchase possibly multiple times or zones within City. That's a new one for me, hadn't seen per-city drone operations license fees. At first I took that as a City Pass to operate Commercial ops... a 1 Fee Lic to carry within City. But later got impression may be 1 per instance... which is concerning for those doing roof inspections, reality projects, etc.
My City currently has minimal sUAV articles within City ordinances & regs... but it's evident this will increase in both State & Federal. Hope it doesn't restrict so much it kills the industry below big enterprise shops.