Welcome, Commercial Drone Pilots!
Join our growing community today!
Sign up

Class E Surface Area Authorizations FAA Memo

Keep in mind this memo distinguishes between:

Item (A) Class E SFC that is within the boundaries of an airport (ie actually part of the airport's airspace) and Item (B) Class E SFC that is part of an airport "Extension". See the picture below that should help differentiate between the two.

@Russ Still does a much better job of explaining it than I can . . . .

26904025_10215485804607524_52395957359059715_n.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boefinator and David Boulanger
OverArizona said:
Anyone have the FAA PDF link? I'm having trouble finding that specific Memorandum on their site.

Thnx
Click to expand...
Brad Pierce said:
Me too,
Anyone have the FAA PDF link? I'm having trouble finding that specific Memorandum on their site.

Thnx
Click to expand...


Here's a link to it in PDF form from Gold Seal's website:
http://goldsealgroundschool.com/uav-library/surface-E-authorizations.pdf


I don't recall the FAA listing most of the MEMO on their website over the years. . .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brad Pierce
Hello @Brad Pierce and welcome to the Commercial Drone Pilots forum. We are glad to have you on board. I'm confident you'll find lots of helpful and enlightening information throughout this forum.

If you haven't already done so, consider adding your LOCATION to your forum profile to help us know where you are when you post suggestions or ask for assistance. It helps a lot more than you might think especially because this is an international forum with members from all parts of the world. Here's a direct link to yours:

https://commercialdronepilots.com/account/personal-details

Allen
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brad Pierce
I have a situation related to this that impacts my Real Estate business.

The POU airport has Class D and a surface-E extension to the northeast. There is also a small airport, 44N within that extension. In the facility map snapshot below i see that the facility map was changed. The area I circled used to have some 0, 100, 400 foot grids around the small airport, 44N.

In the facility map it identifies the extension airspace as "belonging" to POU and not to do with 44N, as it used to. so I'm thinking that, perhaps related to the memo above, I don't need authorization in the extension surface-E, as its for POU, not airport airspace for 44N

Does this sound reasonable?

44n circled facility.JPG POU SkyVector.JPG
 
Last edited:
Thank you but that is not an official link or document I was looking for. Plz, I'd like to know how you or the posting source came to this particular Memo(?).

A little background:
I've been working closely with the FAA for 26yrs as a pilot, A&P, SW Administrator, FEMA Helibase Manager.... Memorandums within federal agencies are passed about daily for intent of other Inter-Agency personal to review for consideration. Usually if a "Memorandum" is intended for public review, it is tagged with a filling code (I'm forgetting the format off to top of my head [because they are just only that - a memorandum and holds no official Authorization, or even guidance - It moves on to the rule making phase for hand]) and made public for inspection. There are lawyers currently arguing since October about subject matter stated in the memo (hence to why this Memo came into existence in January within the Agency).

I've been advised that it is not official. However if an incident occurred within an oE extension the verbiage in the official Part can be argued (easily).

But, my personal advise is since this is still up to the local FISDO Admins interpretation (after the fact of an incorred incident), is to avoid court and lawyer fees until an official (if any comes about) Directive is filled. Talking to your local Office (which i did this morning) isn't enough until it's in an official letter-headed document.

Before I catch slack here on the forum, remember, as pilots, we have to adhere to the CFR's, not interpret them.

~j
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brad Pierce
OverArizona said:
Thank you but that is not an official link or document I was looking for. Plz, I'd like to know how you or the posting source came to this particular Memo(?).

A little background:
I've been working closely with the FAA for 26yrs as a pilot, A&P, SW Administrator, FEMA Helibase Manager.... Memorandums within federal agencies are passed about daily for intent of other Inter-Agency personal to review for consideration. Usually if a "Memorandum" is intended for public review, it is tagged with a filling code (I'm forgetting the format off to top of my head [because they are just only that - a memorandum and holds no official Authorization, or even guidance - It moves on to the rule making phase for hand]) and made public for inspection. There are lawyers currently arguing since October about subject matter stated in the memo (hence to why this Memo came into existence in January within the Agency).

I've been advised that it is not official. However if an incident occurred within an oE extension the verbiage in the official Part can be argued (easily).

But, my personal advise is since this is still up to the local FISDO Admins interpretation (after the fact of an incorred incident), is to avoid court and lawyer fees until an official (if any comes about) Directive is filled. Talking to your local Office (which i did this morning) isn't enough until it's in an official letter-headed document.

Before I catch slack here on the forum, remember, as pilots, we have to adhere to the CFR's, not interpret them.

~j
Click to expand...

I cited my source which is about as much as I can offer. This went around like Hot Cakes and was even discussed by our FAA sUAS Liaison (Kevin Morris, FAA) shortly after it was announced.

If you have doubt of the authenticity, or you need an official copy then by all means follow the link above, see the sender, his official signature, and his contact information and contact him directly. That should get you pretty much in contact with the "horses mouth" as they say.
 
BigAl07 said:
I cited my source which is about as much as I can offer. This went around like Hot Cakes and was even discussed by our FAA sUAS Liaison (Kevin Morris, FAA) shortly after it was announced.

If you have doubt of the authenticity, or you need an official copy then by all means follow the link above, see the sender, his official signature, and his contact information and contact him directly. That should get you pretty much in contact with the "horses mouth" as they say.
Click to expand...

Thank you. Gardner is the current FAA's assigned Technology Liason for Unmanned AC's. I met him at last year's symposium (different title then) breifly. Getting a hold of him now will take weeks and that is why I've been in contact with my local FISDO Admin as other commercial pilots should do pertaining to this subject.

I am not doubting the authenticity of the memo. I know factually that it it an "Inter-Agency" memo because it has not been coded and documented for public archive.

Our only question is the source of this particular Memo. A PART 141 school isn't an official source or shouldn't be releasing Inter-Agency Memorandums publicly.

Please do realize I appreciate your participation in this thread
 

New Posts

Members online

Total: 89 (members: 1, guests: 88)

Forum statistics

Threads
4,447
Messages
38,385
Members
6,309
Latest member
DebbraSmoo