Aerial Armor has a vested interest in promoting the potential "threat component" of droning. And the media thrives on sensational headlines. It will be far more interesting (for the droning community) to see the follow-up report (the one that gives us the precise number of NFZ violations, and the actions taken by local and federal authorities - including the FAA.) I'd also be interested to know if DJI's Aeroscope system reads the serial numbers of ALL drones in the area, or just those manufactured by DJI.
Despite a plethora of courses & webinars, apps, online aids, et al, there still seems to be a significant problem with remote pilots who are either ignorant of the laws and regulations - or who simply choose to disregard same. Perhaps it's time to implement point-of-purchase registration (Yea, I hear the lobbyists howling over that one.), a passive ID/tracking system, and either a Sport or Private license for hobbyists, while retaining the Commercial ticket for professionals. And, sooner or later, we are bound to see the FAA shift from Education mode to Enforcement. (Realistically, without the shift I can't imagine the commercial drone community ever being thoroughly integrated into the NAS.)