- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 14
- Age
- 74
I just completed my Part 107 recurrent exam. There was a topic in the training and on the exam where I disagree with the material. I presented this to [email protected] who told me that my interpretation is correct and they will be notifying the course writers. Here's the details:
The regulation states: "The small unmanned aircraft [must have] lighted anti-collision lighting visible for at least 3 statute miles that has a flash rate sufficient to avoid a collision.”
The training material states: "When conducting sUAS operations during civil twilight or at night, the sUAS must be equipped with anti-collision lights that: Are capable of being visible for at least 3 statue mile from the control station."
The regulation targets visibility to other aircraft while the training targets visibility for the RPIC. I mount my light on top of my drone so other aircraft can see me but according to the training material I should mount on the bottom.
The exam question refers to the light being visible from the control station.
I don't know the time frame for the correction but be aware of the wording for the correct answer.
The regulation states: "The small unmanned aircraft [must have] lighted anti-collision lighting visible for at least 3 statute miles that has a flash rate sufficient to avoid a collision.”
The training material states: "When conducting sUAS operations during civil twilight or at night, the sUAS must be equipped with anti-collision lights that: Are capable of being visible for at least 3 statue mile from the control station."
The regulation targets visibility to other aircraft while the training targets visibility for the RPIC. I mount my light on top of my drone so other aircraft can see me but according to the training material I should mount on the bottom.
The exam question refers to the light being visible from the control station.
I don't know the time frame for the correction but be aware of the wording for the correct answer.