@R.Perry I didn't know the Xfold Dragon X12 rtf, I looked a little over until I saw the price. I have seen $36,000. I have quickly finished my look at that drone ????
Luis, after reading your answer, you made me doubt. To doubt if I had read the conversation well, English is not my native language, but after doing it again, I have read it well. The M600 is a professional drone and not a
consumer drone. I think that PatR has made it clearer than it seems to be what I had made.
MTOW is relevant only in drones designed to put custom payloads as is the case with the M600. For other drones that are not designed for that purpose it is not relevant because it is the manufacturer who determines the weight of the payload. Based on the total weight of the aircraft, it designs the propulsion systems and does so in such a way that it will squeeze the maximum potential of the aircraft leaving very little room for manoeuvre for the payload to have a significant extra weight.
When I analyze the needs of a drone that I'm going to mount, now I'm mounting an 800mm hexacopter, since weight is a fundamental factor, I calculate all the weights, the aircraft and the different possibilities of the payloads I want to mount. Once known the maximum weight that the aircraft will have in total, payload included, it is necessary to calculate which is the propulsion system (engines, variators, propellers, battery) more optimal for that aircraft, but always adjusting it as much as possible with margin to have the lowest possible consumption and the duration of flight is as long as possible. As data, the propulsion system is calculated to be 2.5 times the maximum weight of the aircraft. This allows all kinds of manoeuvres to be carried out safely (we are not talking about freestyle or inverted flight, racer, etc).
This is what big manufacturers do, because they are going to leave room for manoeuvre if it goes against their interests that their aircraft be the best?